- Daily Update from Securities Docket
- Posts
- Do Web3 Engagements Put Lawyers in the Crosshairs?
Do Web3 Engagements Put Lawyers in the Crosshairs?
Good morning from Washington, D.C.! Here's what's going on today.
Clips ✂️
Grayscale Hires Top Obama White House Lawyer David Verrilli
Grayscale Investment LLC has brought in a top legal mind from the former Obama administration as it weighs the possibility of the US Securities and Exchange Commission rejecting its application to convert its $20 billion Bitcoin trust into an exchange-traded fund.
The crypto asset manager announced Tuesday that is has hired Donald Verrilli, who worked as US solicitor general from 2011 to 2016, as additional legal counsel. Grayscale’s decision to hire Verrilli comes after the firm’s CEO Michael Sonnenshein said “all options are on the table” if the SEC rejects its proposal to turn Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (ticker GBTC) into a physically-backed ETF. The regulator has repeatedly denied similar applications. The SEC has until July 6 to make a final decision.
Here is Grayscale's explanation for why they felt the need to bring in this legal firepower:
As we enter the final month before a response is due on our application to convert $GBTC to an ETF, we have retained Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., former Solicitor General of the United States, as additional legal counsel. A short 🧵 on why:
— Grayscale (@Grayscale)
8:45 PM • Jun 7, 2022
Time For Fintech Lawyers To Rethink Web3 Engagements
The Letter makes clear that the time is now for a fintech sea-change. For fintech lawyers, this is not just a matter of doing what is right, it may also be a matter of self-preservation. Reading between the lines, The Letter puts fintech lawyers on notice that when things go south, lawyers could become perfect targets for culpability, including for malpractice suits, regulatory enforcement actions and even criminal prosecutions.
After all, in light of The Letter, how could any lawyer facilitate a crypto-partnership deal like the Nationals did; draft a contract for a crypto-commercial like Embiid did; or support engaging a 5-person Cayman Islands firm serve as an auditor like Tether did?
Crypto Bill Condemned by Consumer Advocates in Washington
The wide-ranging crypto bill introduced Tuesday by U.S. Senators Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand didn’t draw any praise from consumer advocate groups.“The bill gives the industry what it wants most: the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as its primary regulator, even though it exists to police markets where physical producers and purchases of commodities like corn, wheat, oil, natural gas, hogs, and cattle hedge their price risk to facilitate the delivery of everyday goods to the American people,” said Dennis Kelleher, CEO of Better Markets, a Washington-based group that often seeks to counter financial industry lobbying.Kelleher noted that the crypto industry wants the CFTC as a watchdog because it’s the smallest regulator with the smallest budget.
Lummis-Gillibrand crypto bill would elevate CFTC
Self-regulatory organizations “form the first line of defense for regulating large, complex markets” that “can write their own rules as well as enforce SEC or CFTC rules,” he added. “If you want to see digital assets regulated, that almost certainly means developing one or more SROs.”
Marc Fagel, the SEC’s former regional director for San Francisco and now a lecturer at Stanford Law, offered a more cautious view of setting up SROs for a relatively young and still rapidly evolving industry.“
I’m curious how it would work,” he told Protocol. “With FINRA, you have long-standing broker-dealers whose legitimacy and financing are well established. How many players in the crypto space have the same bona fides such that the regulators are willing to delegate oversight authority?”
What does Jon Stewart think about Jarkesy v. SEC? Glad you asked!
On this week’s podcast, we’re talking Jarkesy v. SEC, a major case that could strip government agencies of their power to regulate, really, anything. This Thursday, Jon and @StrictScrutiny_ hosts @LeahLitman, @ProfMMurray, and @kateashaw1 unpack why this case is so important.
— The Problem With Jon Stewart (@TheProblem)
1:00 PM • Jun 7, 2022
The "Revenge of the Nerds Letter" condemning crypto that was released last week with 26 signatories now has over 1,500 signatories.
The window to sign closes this Friday, and the letter is sent to Congress thereafter. Join the 1500+ other fellow programmers, scientists and engineers in the technology community in making your voice heard on this important issue.
— Stephen Diehl (@smdiehl)
9:00 AM • Jun 7, 2022
This has lit the fuse for a lot of Twitter feuding on "the rise of the 'anti-crypto media personality'" and why this "vibe shift" has occurred.
One interesting vibe shift is the rise of the 'anti-crypto media personality'. Folks who do the podcast/press/TV hit circuit purely on their opposition to web3 - even when their day job has nothing to do with crypto in any sense.
— Sriram Krishnan - sriramk.eth (@sriramk)
2:01 AM • Jun 7, 2022
The Premier League has filed 2 US trademark applications for
▶️ NFTs, cryptocurrencies, digital tokens + collectibles
▶️ Digital asset trading
▶️ Financial and crypto services
▶️ Virtual clothing, footwear, and sports gear#NFTs#Metaverse#Cryptocurrencies#PremierLeague
— Mike Kondoudis (@KondoudisLaw)
11:00 AM • Jun 6, 2022