- Daily Update from Securities Docket
- Posts
- SEC Announces Dismissal of Action Against Former CFO of View, Inc.
SEC Announces Dismissal of Action Against Former CFO of View, Inc.
Plus another section for the syllabus of “The Law of Elon Musk.”
SPONSORED BY
Good morning! Here’s what’s up.

People
Tracy Davis, former Assistant Regional Director in the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, has joined Mechanics Bank as VP, Associate General Counsel, Securities.
Ellen Connell has joined Eversheds Sutherland ias a partner in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Clips ✂️
SEC Dismisses Civil Enforcement Action Against Former Chief Financial Officer
On February 27, 2026, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed a joint stipulation with Vidul Prakash to dismiss, with prejudice, the Commission’s civil enforcement action against him.
As stated in the joint stipulation, the Commission’s decision to exercise its discretion and seek dismissal is “based on the facts and circumstances of this case and its ongoing review of the evidence, including evidence developed in discovery” and “does not reflect the SEC’s position on any other case.”
👉 The Joint Stipulation is here.
In 2023, the SEC sued Prakash, the former CFO of "smart" window manufacturer, View Inc., “for his negligent failure to ensure the company's disclosure of $28 million in projected warranty-related liabilities.”
Prakash was represented by Morison & Foerster, and trial in the case had been scheduled to begin on February 23, 2026. MoFo stated on its website that during discovery, the defense was able to develop powerful evidence supporting the correctness of View’s accounting for defective products. “We are pleased that this matter has been resolved,” said MoFo’s Craig Martin. “The dismissal affirms what we have said all along: Vidul Prakash always acted appropriately and with integrity.”
Musk Is on Trial Over His Tweets Ahead of Twitter Purchase
Elon Musk’s brief effort to back out of buying Twitter Inc. in 2022 is the focus of a trial that kicked off Monday over claims the world’s richest person manipulated the company’s stock price to get himself a better deal.
Musk eventually paid $44 billion for Twitter that fall, closing the buyout at the $54.20-per-share price he had originally agreed to six months earlier. But during the in-between months, a group of investors allege, Musk publicly attacked the company in a ruse to drive down its market value and benefit himself at their expense. […]
“We’re here today because Elon Musk cheated investors” in an attempt to save himself billions of dollars on the Twitter buyout, Mark Molumphy, a lawyer for the investors, told jurors in his opening statement. “The evidence will show Mr Musk knew exactly what he was doing” by tweeting out false and misleading information about the deal, the lawyer said.
Michael Lifrak, a lawyer for Musk, countered that none of the information at issue with Musk’s tweets about the deal was false.
“The evidence will show Mr. Musk didn’t commit securities fraud and it isn’t even close,” he said. He told the jury Musk will take the stand to show that his concerns about Twitter’s customer base “were real and weren’t a fraud.”
👉 I don’t know if Prof. Stephen Bainbridge is still teaching “The Law of Elon Musk” at UCLA Law School but, if so, here’s another section for the syllabus!
SEC, Apex Spar Over Off-Channel Communications Sweep Settlement
A Texas broker-dealer offering digital wealth management services told a US appeals court the firm received harsher settlement terms than other targets of a Biden-era SEC crackdown on companies accused of failing to preserve business-related communications on employees’ personal devices.
The Securities and Exchange Commission denied a bid from Apex Clearing Corp. to alter its settlement over off-channel communications while imposing less burdensome sanctions on other firms for similar conduct, Apex argued Monday before the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
But modifying an existing settlement is “not an everyday occasion,” said Judge Leslie H. Southwick….
👉 On his LinkedIn, Sidley’s David Petron has a detailed discussion of the oral argument before the Fifth Circuit. He notes that the panel had a lot of questions about why the SEC acted as it did it here, when it treated similarly situated firms differently. Overall, he writes, “this case is a bit of a Rorschach test—a lot depends on how the panel interprets the ink blots. Oral argument bore that out. It feels like a bit of a jump ball, and the outcome could go either direction.”
I find a lot of the information shared in this newsletter on LinkedIn. If we aren't already connected, please click on the image below and let's connect. (Not so you can follow me, but so I can follow you!).
South Korea probes $4.8 million crypto theft after tax seizure photo blunder
South Korean tax authorities lost $4.8 million of seized crypto after displaying the relevant wallets’ seed phrases in a photograph covering the Feb. 26 event.
The crypto was taken immediately after the National Tax Service (NTS) shared a photo that included hardware wallets and their secret phrases. The service apologized for the incident, Asia Business Daily reported on Sunday.
“In an effort to provide more vivid information, we did not realize that sensitive information was included and carelessly provided the original photo,” the tax office said. “This is entirely the fault of the National Tax Service (NTS), with no excuse.”

SPONSORED BY
Securities Enforcement Forum West 2026 is set for Thursday, May 21, 2026 at the historic Palace Hotel in San Francisco! Join us in person or tune in virtually to hear from nearly 50 luminaries in the securities enforcement field—including senior government officials, in-house counsel from major corporations, and lawyers and consultants from the best firms and in the world.
In addition, Securities Enforcement Forum West will feature a cant-miss Keynote Q&A with Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal, moderated by Peter Altman of Akin.
👉 Please register here. See you May 21 in San Francisco!!!

X
👉 Another form of “AI-washing:”




