SEC Agrees to Drop Crypto Case Against Cumberland DRW

Plus the impact of DOGE on corporate compliance and audit teams.

SPONSORED BY

Good morning! Here’s what’s up.

People

Daniel Alonso, former Chief of the Criminal Division in the EDNY, has joined Vedder Price as a partner in the firm’s New York office.

Clips ✂️

SEC Agrees to Drop Enforcement Suit Against Cumberland DRW, Firm Says

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has agreed to drop its enforcement case against Cumberland DRW, the crypto trading arm of Chicago-based trading firm DRW, according to a Tuesday announcement from the company.

The SEC sued Cumberland DRW last October, accusing the firm of acting as an unregistered securities dealer and alleging it sold more than $2 billion in unregistered securities, naming tokens like Polygon (POL), Solana (SOL), Cosmos (ATOM), Algorand (ALGO) and Filecoin (FIL) as a “non-exhaustive” list of tokens the agency considered to be securities.

by Corporate Counsel

👉 Let me break out my Apple pencil to update this graphic from a Monday article in CoinDesk that has already taken three hits this week (Hex, Kraken, Cumberland).

DOGE Comes for the SEC

Compliance and audit professionals are hearing today that the DOGE mind virus has now reached the Securities and Exchange Commission, with significant cuts in personnel and resources looming. Let’s take a look at all this to understand what’s really going on at the SEC and how those changes are likely to affect corporate compliance and audit teams.

First and most notably, on Monday news reports surfaced that the SEC has made $50,000 buyout offers to all eligible employees (those who have been with the agency since before January 2024) if they quit or resign by April. Apparently this is a prelude to future reduction-in-force job cuts the SEC might make after that.

Second, word also came over the weekend that the Government Services Administration plans to close SEC offices in Los Angeles and Philadelphia, and wants to close the SEC regional office in Chicago as soon as the GSA can figure out how and when it can wriggle out of the Chicago lease without incurring significant financial penalties. News also broke at the end of February that the SEC plans to lay off all its regional office directors, too.

So what does all this mean? It means the SEC will be working at diminished capacity, where scofflaws can enjoy a free ride while good corporate citizens grit their teeth and endure a dysfunctional relationship with your regulator.

Meanwhile, here’s what these DOGE cutbacks do not do.

by Radical Compliance

👉 Good article by Matt Kelly of Radical Compliance. He states that the only practical effect of the planned cuts and chaos at the SEC will be “to reduce agency manpower while almost all agency rules still remain in place,” and adds:

“You’re waiting on the Division of Corporation Finance to reply to a comment letter? Well keep waiting, because the SEC will have fewer staff. You want a staff review of a confidential registration statement? Keep waiting, because the SEC will have fewer staff. You’re in discussions to settle an enforcement action, or waiting for a reply to a no-action letter, or you want a decision on a whistleblower award submission you made? Wait, wait, wait. (OK, maybe not on enforcement matters, because we all know the SEC is going to give way on enforcement like a soggy grocery bag.)”

SEC Crypto Task Force to Host Roundtable on Security Status

The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that its Crypto Task Force will host a series of roundtables to discuss key areas of interest in the regulation of crypto assets. The “Spring Sprint Toward Crypto Clarity” series will begin on March 21 with its inaugural roundtable, “How We Got Here and How We Get Out – Defining Security Status.”

by SEC Press Release

👉 The SEC has announced the lineup for the March 21 Crypto Task Force Roundtable:

DOJ Forsakes Defending the ALJ Process Against Article II Challenges

An inability or self-imposed refusal to bring enforcement actions before an ALJ likely will diminish a regulator’s likelihood of success in many litigations. Further, litigating in federal district court also can require more government resources. Although the legal landscape is still evolving and it is difficult to make reliable predictions at this point, this change in position should alter the respective bargaining power of the regulator and the regulated entity during many underlying examinations in which the regulator finds perceived violations. Certain enforcement actions that previously would have been brought either will be streamlined or simply not be brought at all.

Finally, it is difficult to see how this situation will be resolved quickly. The entire premise of a successful Article II challenge is that an ALJ is protected from removal under Section 7521, and individual ALJs may protest or litigate the issue of how easily they can be fired. Individual agency commissioners may have conflicting perspectives on how to best structure their in-house courts. Or, the current administration may pursue other avenues.

by Holland & Knight

👉 Post by Peter Hardy and Jessica Magee of Holland & Knight.

SPONSORED BY

FTI Consulting welcomes Terrence Brody and Marc-Philip Ferzan as Senior Managing Directors in Risk and Investigations practice. Together, they bring a combined 45 years of experience in complex investigations, risk management and compliance advisory, as well as assisting companies in understanding and adapting to changing government policies.

Learn more about their backgrounds and expertise here.

X