- Daily Update from Securities Docket
- Posts
- đ° Blowing the Whistle ... to Short Sellers
đ° Blowing the Whistle ... to Short Sellers
Plus how you can trade with Nancy, Ted and the rest of Congress.
Good morning and Happy Monday! Here's what's up.
People
Kristy Greenberg, former Deputy Chief of the SDNY's Criminal Division, has joined Hogan Lovells as a partner in its New York office.
Clips âď¸
Nikola Whistle-Blower Made $600,000 Off Short Sale, Jury Told
A former Nikola Corp. contractor whose allegations of fraud at the electric truck maker helped spur a criminal investigation told a federal jury he made $600,000 off a short sellerâs report on the company.
Paul Lackey, an engineer at the electric-drive systems company EVDrive that did contract work for Nikola, was testifying under questioning by the defense in the criminal trial of Nikola founder Trevor Milton. He said he gave short seller Hindenburg Research information in exchange for a share of its profits from shorting the companyâs shares.
Recently, in SEC v. Spartan Securities Group, Ltd, et al., a Florida federal court held that the Securities and Exchange Commission (âSECâ) could seek disgorgement and direct funds to the Treasury because the defrauded victims could not be identified.
***
This question was important because some cases do not lend themselves to victim compensation. For instance, it is sometimes difficult if not impossible to identify the victims of insider trading. Assuming the victims are the parties on the opposite sides of the transactions, they may be unidentifiable, especially if the insider trading involves options transactions. Did this mean that disgorgement will be unavailable in insider-trading actions? Or that inability to identify victims will be a valid reason to pay disgorgement funds to the Treasury? These open questions may have been clarified.
Senate Democrats will not introduce legislation to ban members of Congress from trading stocks until after the November midterm election, according to Democratic Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon, a leading proponent of the legislation.
âIâm looking forward to getting this across the finish line, but itâs not going to happen before the election,â Merkley told Insider on Thursday.
***
âI feel like weâve made very large strides towards a consensus bill,â Merkley said during an interview in the US Capitol. âBut there are a whole lot of other bills and judicial nominations lined up for the balance of the few days we have left here.â
đ In the meantime, perhaps you would like to trade along with Congress with a new pair of exchange-traded funds that are reportedly on the way:
"The Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (ticker NANC) and the Unusual Whales Subversive Republican Trading ETF (KRUZ) would analyze the financial disclosure of lawmakers from both parties and their spouses and dependent children to construct a portfolio of between 500 and 600 holdings, according to a regulatory filing Thursday. When a position is reported as sold, the ETFs will offload the security as well."
Corporate compliance officers, drop everything. We have a second speech from the Justice Department about corporate misconduct and compliance programs that needs your immediate attention.
Assistant attorney general Kenneth Polite gave the speech in Texas on Friday. It follows the speech that his boss, deputy attorney general Lisa Monaco, gave one day earlier in New York. Monaco announced several major policy shifts in how the Justice Department will prosecute corporate crime â but Politeâs speech goes into more detail about what the departmentâs Criminal Division will now want to see for culture of compliance, plus the new policy that chief compliance officers must certify the strength of their compliance programs as part of a corporate settlement.
Perhaps most notably, Polite said the Criminal Division is exploring ways to âshift the burden of corporate financial penalties away from shareholders â who in many cases do not have a role in misconduct â onto those more directly responsible.â He then continued:
"In the coming months, our team will be meeting with, among others, our agency partners and experts on executive compensation, and gathering relevant data points. Based on these inputs, the Criminal Division will then provide further guidance on how prosecutors will consider and reward corporations that develop and apply compensation claw back policies."
Credit Suisse Case Spotlights Who Can Lead Securities Lawsuits
A federal magistrate judgeâs rejection of a lead plaintiff bid in a proposed securities class action against Credit Suisse Group AG highlights how courts decide if an investor is right for the role.
The judge found Credit Suisse investor Yasni Jimenez wouldnât adequately represent a proposed class alleging the bank made false and misleading statements about its practice of lending money to Russian oligarchs. Jimenez, who estimated losing $621, was the only investor who requested to be lead plaintiff.
***
Jimenez argued the judge didnât have the power to reject his request because he was the only candidate for lead plaintiff. The decision highlights other unsettled questions about how judges assess whether an investor should assume the role. Itâs unclear how much certain considerations, like the size of losses or attorneysâ fees arrangements, should factor in when no one else is vying for the lead position.
Thus, it remains unclear whether, how, and to what extent DAOs might displace traditional organizational structures. But they represent an increasingly popular and potentially transformational business idea, rooted in the mindset and methods of modern timesâmaking them worthy of attention as they evolve.
--In this primer on DAOs, we discuss:--The recent growth of DAOs;--How DAOs work;--The advantages and disadvantages of DAOs;--Key legal and regulatory issues that DAOs face;--The Vermont, Wyoming, and Tennessee legislation covering DAOs, and other formats for providing DAOs with legally recognized status;--Related practice points; and--Case histories of some well-known DAOs.
Cracking Down on a Wall Street Trend: E.S.G. Makeovers
Itâs the Wall Street version of a truth-in-advertising crackdown, and itâs a focal point for a special E.S.G. enforcement task force set up last year by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The task force is essentially looking for instances of banks and money managers engaging in âgreenwashingâ â using misleading claims to make their investment funds or strategies appear to be E.S.G.-compliant.
Goldman is among the fund managers the task force is investigating, though it is unclear which of the bankâs funds are drawing scrutiny. A person briefed on the matter said regulators were focused on two of its eight E.S.G. funds in the United States with about $750 million in assets.
The task force has gotten off to a slow start â bringing just two enforcement actions this year. But securities defense lawyers expect the pace to pick up in the coming months.
"I'm less sympathetic for the spouse who is the stay at home day trader than the spouse who has sensitive information. There's a difference there," says Jay Clayton on congressional stock trading. "The 45 day delay for members themselves is a good place to start."
â Squawk Box (@SquawkCNBC)
11:31 AM ⢠Sep 19, 2022
A lawyer on an @ABAesq panel I was on yesterday boasted how crypto-transactions are easy to track and even shilled that crypto was a boon for law enforcement. This is perhaps the most frustrating and misleading of all crypto-enthusiast retort. Here's why:
â John Reed Stark (@JohnReedStark)
4:58 PM ⢠Sep 17, 2022