- Daily Update from Securities Docket
- Posts
- Bloomberg: SEC Enforcement Pace Under Trump Roughly the Same as Under Biden
Bloomberg: SEC Enforcement Pace Under Trump Roughly the Same as Under Biden
Plus SEC Commissioner Peirce says "tokenized securities are still securities."
SPONSORED BY
Good morning! Here’s what’s up.

Clips ✂️
SEC Fraud Enforcers Keep Pace Under Trump Despite Crypto Retreat
The SEC is maintaining roughly the same volume of cases under the Trump administration as it had previously, even as it pulls back on Biden-era actions targeting crypto and securities dealers and contends with potential personnel and funding cuts.
The Securities and Exchange Commission filed 44 enforcement actions from Inauguration Day to the end of June, compared with 48 filings over the same stretch last year, a Bloomberg Law review found.
“Everyone expected there to be a lot less SEC activity, because there’s been downsizing of government and a change in priorities,” said Mark Bini, a partner at Reed Smith LLP who represents companies in government investigations and litigation. “But I suspect that we are going to see a lot of these traditional heartland cases, because they’ve narrowed the focus.”
👉 POLL (and please feel free to hit “reply” to this email if you want to elaborate, it will go to me):
Does this data showing roughly the same volume of cases under the Trump administration (vs. last year under Biden) track with what you are seeing in practice? |
Enchanting, but Not Magical: A Statement on the Tokenization of Securities
Blockchain technology has unlocked novel models for distributing and trading securities in a “tokenized” format. Tokenization may facilitate capital formation and enhance investors’ ability to use their assets as collateral. Enchanted by these possibilities, new entrants and many traditional firms are embracing onchain products. As powerful as blockchain technology is, it does not have magical abilities to transform the nature of the underlying asset. Tokenized securities are still securities. Accordingly, market participants must consider—and adhere to—the federal securities laws when transacting in these instruments.
👉 The NYT reports that Commissioner Peirce’s statement comes at a time when “some critics have worried that the tokenization of assets like shares in private companies that can be traded on the blockchain might mean those digital assets are not subject to federal securities laws.”
Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools and processes are becoming increasingly pervasive in many industry sectors and in many phases of business. AI use is also spreading to corporate processes and functions. For example, as I recently noted, some companies many be using AI tools to draft the MD&A in their periodic reports. And, at least according to a recent post in the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance by lawyers from the Debevoise law firm, some corporate boards may be “adopting AI meeting tools to assist with the drafting of board and committee minutes.” As the memo’s authors note, board adoption of AI tools for these purposes may offer some benefits, but the use of the tools also entails risk, which board members will want to take into account in using the tools.
👉 The Debevoise post mentioned above (by Charu A. Chandrasekhar, Avi Gesser, and Eric T. Juergens) is here.
We’re Leaving Delaware, And We Think You Should Consider Leaving Too
It used to be a no-brainer: start a company, incorporate in Delaware. That is no longer the case due to recent actions by the Court of Chancery, which have injected an unprecedented level of subjectivity into judicial decisions, undermining the court’s reputation for unbiased expertise. This has introduced legal uncertainty into what was widely considered the gold standard of U.S. corporate law. In contrast, Nevada has taken significant steps in establishing a technical, non-ideological forum for resolving business disputes. We have therefore decided to move the state of incorporation of our primary business, AH Capital Management, from Delaware to Nevada, which has historically been a business friendly state with fair and balanced regulatory policies.
We could have made this move quietly, but we think it’s important for our stakeholders, and for the broader tech and VC communities, to understand why we’ve reached this decision. For founders considering a similar move, there is often a reluctance to leave Delaware, based in part on concerns for how investors will react. As the largest VC firm in the country, we hope that our decision signals to our portfolio companies, as well as to prospective portfolio companies, that such concerns may be overblown. While we will continue to fund companies incorporated in Delaware, we believe Nevada is a viable alternative and may make sense for many founders.
👉 Post by Jai Ramaswamy, Andy Hill, and Kevin McKinley of Andreessen Horowitz.
DealBook notes that if “Dexit” catches on it could potentially cost the state of Delaware billions of dollars.

SPONSORED BY
Since Paul Atkins became Chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 21, 2025, the SEC has announced significant pivots in its approaches to enforcement, regulatory guidance, investment adviser oversight, and other areas. Chairman Atkins’ brief tenure has already been marked by a deregulatory philosophy that emphasizes investor choice, streamlines enforcement priorities, and retreats from numerous rulemaking initiatives commenced during the term of his predecessor, Gary Gensler.
This article describes some of the most consequential policy and regulatory changes to date, as well as their implications for issuers, fund managers, and investors.
Learn more in this article (click here) by Norman Harrison or email him directly at [email protected].

X
Genuine game changer. There is a lot of insider trading around FDA decisions and correspondence. And companies don’t always do the right thing and disclose. I applaud this decision by @DrMakaryFDA
— Dan Taylor (@ProfAnalytics)
12:14 PM • Jul 10, 2025
“And then shortly after we made them testify they haven’t accepted a PE offer… we fired them!!!! lmaoooo”
— litquidity (@litcapital)
1:24 PM • Jul 9, 2025
Two customers of investment platform Linqto sued the company’s ex-CEO on Wednesday, a day after the company filed for bankruptcy, alleging that they were duped into buying into an investment fund that promised access to private companies’ equity.
— Reuters Legal (@ReutersLegal)
2:50 AM • Jul 10, 2025